Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Planning Literature ; 37(1):133-133, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1755735
2.
Journal of Planning Literature ; 37(1):124-125, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1755729
3.
Journal of Structured Finance ; 26(3):29-40, 2020.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-961732

ABSTRACT

The fundamental differences between the structure of the market for government mortgages, pooled into Ginnie Mae securities, and the market for government sponsored enterprises (GSE) mortgages are at the heart of the constraints that impact the servicing of government loans. This is exacerbated by the higher-risk profile of Ginnie Mae borrowers and heavy concentration of non-banks in the Ginnie space. The pandemic and the subsequent passage of the CARES Act demonstrated the need for a federal liquidity facility for non-banks. This is a more pressing issue in the Ginnie Mae market, with potential systemic implications for the mortgage market. This article explains these issues in detail, concludes that a federal liquidity for non-banks is necessary, and discusses two options, one for the current crisis and another for the future: a COVID-19 liquidity facility at the Federal Reserve, and in the long run, federal home loan Bank (FHLB) membership for non-banks to allow for access to FHLB advances. Copyright © 2020 Urban Institute. All rights reserved.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL